WhatsApp verso la rivoluzione definitiva dei gruppi: aggiornamento in arrivo a marzo

Spread the love

Oggi 4 marzo abbiamo finalmente alcune anticipazioni sul tipo di aggiornamento che toccheremo con mano attraverso WhatsApp durante il mese appena iniziato. Tutto ruota attorno ad alcuni post di WABetaInfo e al nuovo sistema di inviti per i gruppi della popolare applicazione. Come tutti sanno, a breve saremo noi a decidere se entrare o meno in queste conversazioni una volta ricevuto l’invito.

A tal proposito diventa importante analizzare in modo più dettagliato quanto emerso attraverso l’ultimo aggiornamento di WhatsApp, almeno stando alla versione beta emersa proprio in questi giorni:

  • Tutti: quando l’utente seleziona questa opzione (quella abilitata per impostazione predefinita), può essere sempre aggiunta ai gruppi.

  • I miei contatti: quando questa opzione è selezionata, l’utente può essere sempre aggiunto ai gruppi, ma solo dai suoi contatti. Se qualcun altro, non presente nell’elenco dei suoi contatti, cerca di aggiungerlo, riceverà un invito privato per unirsi al gruppo.

  • Nessuno: a mio avviso l’opzione migliore da scegliere, l’utente non può essere aggiunto direttamente ai gruppi, in qualsiasi situazione. Significa che riceverà un invito privato ogni volta che qualcuno vorrà aggiungerlo ai gruppi.

Quelle appena riportate sono le modalità che potremo scegliere per quanto riguarda l’inclusione nei gruppi WhatsApp, nel momento in cui l’aggiornamento sarà disponibile nella sua versione definitiva.

13.250 commenti su “WhatsApp verso la rivoluzione definitiva dei gruppi: aggiornamento in arrivo a marzo”

  1. It’s no secret how President Donald Trump feels about sports teams turning away from Native American mascots. He’s repeatedly called for the return of the Washington Redskins and Cleveland Indians, claiming their recent rebrands were part of a “woke” agenda designed to erase history.

    But one surprising team has really gotten the president’s attention: the Massapequa Chiefs.

    The Long Island school district has refused to change its logo and name under a mandate from New York state banning schools from using team mascots appropriating Indigenous culture. Schools were given two years to rebrand, but Massapequa is the lone holdout, having missed the June 30 deadline to debut a new logo.
    [url=https://kra-33at.ru]kraken35[/url]
    The district lost an initial lawsuit it filed against the state but now has the federal government on its side. In May, Trump’s Department of Education intervened on the district’s behalf, claiming the state’s mascot ban is itself discriminatory.

    Massapequa’s Chiefs logo — an American Indian wearing a yellow feathered headdress — is expected to still be prominently displayed when the fall sports season kicks off soon, putting the quiet Long Island hamlet at the center of a political firestorm.
    [url=https://kra–39-cc.ru]kra39 cc[/url]
    The district is now a key “battleground,” said Oliver Roberts, a Massapequa alum and the lawyer representing the school board in its fresh lawsuit against New York claiming that the ban is unconstitutional and discriminatory.

    The Trump administration claims New York’s mascot ban violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits recipients of federal funds from engaging in discriminatory behavior based on race, color or national origin — teeing up a potentially precedent-setting fight.

    The intervention on behalf of Massapequa follows a pattern for a White House that has aggressively applied civil rights protections to police “reverse discrimination” and coerced schools and universities into policy concessions by withholding federal funds.

    “Our goal is to assist nationally,” Roberts said. “It’s us putting forward our time and effort to try and assist with this national movement and push back against the woke bureaucrats trying to cancel our country’s history and tradition.”
    kra33 cc
    https://kra-33at.ru

    Rispondi
  2. Kamagra reviews from US customers [url=https://kamameds.shop/#]Kamagra oral jelly USA availability[/url] Fast-acting ED solution with discreet packaging

    Rispondi
  3. Envio mis saludos a todos los aliados eternos del casino !
    Un casino sin registro permite apostar directamente sin procesos largos. Solo necesitas un correo electrГіnico y una contraseГ±a. casino sin licencia Por eso, los casinos sin registro son perfectos para quienes valoran la rapidez.
    En casinos sin licencia espaГ±ola los lГ­mites de retiro son mГЎs flexibles. Puedes retirar grandes cantidades sin esperas innecesarias. Esta ventaja convierte al casino sin licencia espaГ±ola en favorito de los jugadores avanzados.
    Casinos no regulados ofrecen juegos exclusivos – п»їhttps://casinoonlineeuropeo.blogspot.com/
    Que disfrutes de increibles juegos !
    casino sin licencia

    Rispondi
  4. What we’re covering
    • Zelensky in Washington: European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House, as he meets with US President Donald Trump this afternoon. Trump said Zelensky must agree to some of Russia’s conditions — including that Ukraine cede Crimea and agree never to join NATO — for the war to end.
    [url=https://kpa37.cc]kra33 СЃСЃ[/url]
    • Potential security guarantees: At last week’s summit with Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to allow security guarantees for Ukraine and made concessions on “land swaps” as part of a potential peace deal, US envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN. Zelensky suggested that such guarantees would need to be stronger than those that “didn’t work” in the past. Russia has yet to mention such agreements.
    [url=https://kra32-at.cc]kra32[/url]
    • On the ground: Zelensky condemned Russia’s latest strikes across Ukraine, which killed at least 10 people, saying the Kremlin intends to “humiliate diplomatic efforts” and underscores “why reliable security guarantees are required.”
    kra37 cc
    https://kpa31.cc

    Rispondi
  5. Affordable sildenafil citrate tablets for men [url=https://kamameds.shop/#]Non-prescription ED tablets discreetly shipped[/url] Kamagra oral jelly USA availability

    Rispondi
  6. What we’re covering
    • Zelensky in Washington: European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House, as he meets with US President Donald Trump this afternoon. Trump said Zelensky must agree to some of Russia’s conditions — including that Ukraine cede Crimea and agree never to join NATO — for the war to end.
    [url=https://kra34-at.com]kraken39[/url]
    • Potential security guarantees: At last week’s summit with Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to allow security guarantees for Ukraine and made concessions on “land swaps” as part of a potential peace deal, US envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN. Zelensky suggested that such guarantees would need to be stronger than those that “didn’t work” in the past. Russia has yet to mention such agreements.
    [url=https://kra-36cc.net]kra30 at[/url]
    • On the ground: Zelensky condemned Russia’s latest strikes across Ukraine, which killed at least 10 people, saying the Kremlin intends to “humiliate diplomatic efforts” and underscores “why reliable security guarantees are required.”
    kra39 cc
    https://kra39at.cc

    Rispondi
  7. What we’re covering
    • Zelensky in Washington: European leaders will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House, as he meets with US President Donald Trump this afternoon. Trump said Zelensky must agree to some of Russia’s conditions — including that Ukraine cede Crimea and agree never to join NATO — for the war to end.
    [url=https://kra-34.cc]kra38 cc[/url]
    • Potential security guarantees: At last week’s summit with Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to allow security guarantees for Ukraine and made concessions on “land swaps” as part of a potential peace deal, US envoy Steve Witkoff told CNN. Zelensky suggested that such guarantees would need to be stronger than those that “didn’t work” in the past. Russia has yet to mention such agreements.
    [url=https://kra34cc.net]kra33 СЃСЃ[/url]
    • On the ground: Zelensky condemned Russia’s latest strikes across Ukraine, which killed at least 10 people, saying the Kremlin intends to “humiliate diplomatic efforts” and underscores “why reliable security guarantees are required.”
    kra39 cc
    https://at-kra38.cc

    Rispondi
  8. He has had more cordial, more productive, meetings with US President Donald Trump since that now-notorious encounter on February 28.
    [url=https://kraken2trfqodidvlh4aa337cpzfrhdlfldhve5.com]kraken6gf6o4rxewycqwjgfchzgxyfeoj5xafqbfm4vgvyaig2vmxvyd[/url]
    But for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, today’s meeting at the White House will surely trigger awkward memories of that very public clash with the US President almost six months ago. Navigating the treacherous waters in which he finds himself today will be no easier.
    [url=https://kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd0.com]kraken3yvbvzmhytnrnuhsy772i6dfobofu652e27f5hx6y5cpj7rgyd onion[/url]
    Increasingly, it appears likely he will be told to give up land in exchange for some sort of security guarantees.

    The land side of that “deal” will be obvious. It can be drawn on a map. Crimea: gone, says Trump. Donetsk: give all of it up, says Putin, apparently with Trump’s blessing.

    But the security guarantees? That’s where far more challenging ideas, like credibility, come into play. Could Zelensky rely on the US to deliver on some NATO Article 5-type promise, to defend Ukraine if Russia breaches any peace agreement?

    Putin himself might even see an opportunity to further weaken the West, by testing any such guarantees, confident they are a bluff he could call. But all that would be for the future.

    For now, it looks like Zelensky will have to weigh up whether he could bring his country with him if he were to cede territory to Russia – some of it still in Ukrainian hands – or whether he and his people could bear the costs of potentially defying Trump a Nobel Peace Prize, and say no.

    If he chose the latter, would the US President immediately end all remaining American support for Ukraine, in terms of military aid and intelligence sharing, for instance?

    If that happened, to what extent could Zelensky’s European allies really step in and fill in the gaps left by any full US retreat?

    It is an almost impossibly hard choice before him.
    kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo33ad.onion
    https://kraken5af44k24fwzohe6fvqfgxfsee4lgydb3ayzkfhlzqhuwlo33ad0.com

    Rispondi
  9. He has had more cordial, more productive, meetings with US President Donald Trump since that now-notorious encounter on February 28.
    [url=https://kraken2trfqodidvlh4aa7cpzfrhdlfldhve5nf7njhumwr7instad.com]kraken7jmgt7yhhe2c4iyilthnhcugfylcztsdhh7otrr6jgdw667pqd.onion[/url]
    But for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, today’s meeting at the White House will surely trigger awkward memories of that very public clash with the US President almost six months ago. Navigating the treacherous waters in which he finds himself today will be no easier.
    [url=https://kraken6gf6o4rxewycqwjgfchzgxyfeoj5xafqbfm4vgvyaig2vmxvyd0.com]kraken3yvbvzmhytnrnuhsy772i6dfobofu652e27f5hx6y5cpj7rgyd.onion[/url]
    Increasingly, it appears likely he will be told to give up land in exchange for some sort of security guarantees.

    The land side of that “deal” will be obvious. It can be drawn on a map. Crimea: gone, says Trump. Donetsk: give all of it up, says Putin, apparently with Trump’s blessing.

    But the security guarantees? That’s where far more challenging ideas, like credibility, come into play. Could Zelensky rely on the US to deliver on some NATO Article 5-type promise, to defend Ukraine if Russia breaches any peace agreement?

    Putin himself might even see an opportunity to further weaken the West, by testing any such guarantees, confident they are a bluff he could call. But all that would be for the future.

    For now, it looks like Zelensky will have to weigh up whether he could bring his country with him if he were to cede territory to Russia – some of it still in Ukrainian hands – or whether he and his people could bear the costs of potentially defying Trump a Nobel Peace Prize, and say no.

    If he chose the latter, would the US President immediately end all remaining American support for Ukraine, in terms of military aid and intelligence sharing, for instance?

    If that happened, to what extent could Zelensky’s European allies really step in and fill in the gaps left by any full US retreat?

    It is an almost impossibly hard choice before him.
    kraken3yvbvzmhytnrnuhsy772i6dfobofu652e27f5hx6y5cpj7rgyd
    https://kraken3yvbvzmhytnrnuhsy772i6dfobofu652e27f5hx6y5cpj7rgyd.com

    Rispondi

Lascia un commento